Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mary Garrity - Ida B. Wells-Barnett - Google Art Project - restoration crop.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Mary Garrity - Ida B. Wells-Barnett - Google Art Project - restoration crop.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2015 at 14:06:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info created by Mary Garrity, restored and uploaded by Adam Cuerden, nominated by -- Yann (talk) 14:06, 5 May 2015 (UTC)- Info African-American journalist, newspaper editor, suffragist, sociologist, and an early leader in the civil rights movement.
Support -- Yann (talk) 14:06, 5 May 2015 (UTC)- Weak Support. Nice portrait. Her clothes are blurred, but her face is sharp and I'm fine with the quality given the era. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Comment I agree with King but I have no idea even an old picture, this kind of image editing like 500px.com (I don’t hate that site.) is suitableacceptable for FP or not. (For modern photos of course not, imo, but this one is an old one...)--Laitche (talk) 01:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)- There is no special effect here, at least nothing done recently. And she is a famous person. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- No, I don't mean digital effect. In this case, have a look at the lower part carefully, in my opinion, the lower part is so blurry(maybe motion blur or out of focus like the top of her hair) and I guess that was one of the reasons they had to apply this effect so I'm
Neutral (If Wikipedia FP, I'll definitely support this one). --Laitche (talk) 11:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- No, I don't mean digital effect. In this case, have a look at the lower part carefully, in my opinion, the lower part is so blurry(maybe motion blur or out of focus like the top of her hair) and I guess that was one of the reasons they had to apply this effect so I'm
- There is no special effect here, at least nothing done recently. And she is a famous person. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support There seems to be a tiny little bit of motion blur on her clothing, but unlike the other case I think that's acceptable here. --El Grafo (talk) 09:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Support in spite of some blurred areas. It's probably impossible to restore it any better. --Tremonist (talk) 12:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Support per King of Hearts and Tremonist. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:20, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Very high value, nicely restored.--Jebulon (talk) 15:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support For a historical picture is accettable... --LivioAndronico talk 15:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, Category:Historical would be better. --Laitche (talk) 16:42, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Category changed to Historical. Yann (talk) 17:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, Category:Historical would be better. --Laitche (talk) 16:42, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:10, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Fine restoration of historical picture. --Pugilist (talk) 19:22, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 19:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:32, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 17:07, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 12:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical
