Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Brienz from above.jpg

File:Lake Brienz from above.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2010 at 22:44:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Brienz from above.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Brienz from above.jpg

•  Info created by Martin Abegglen on flickr - uploaded by MadGeographer - nominated by MadGeographer -- mgeo talk 22:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support (as nominator) -- mgeo talk 22:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support In my opinion this is a Quality Image, but since it is quite intresting, I´ll give it my support.--Snaevar (talk) 15:23, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:38, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The horizon level seems a bit too low (close to center). LeavXC (talk) 22:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Where is it supposed to be according to you? bamse (talk) 07:50, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

- Preferably higher (according to the rule of thirds). The picture would be nicer, IMO, if it showed more of the bottom. It could use a little less sky and a bit more land. - LeavXC (talk) 08:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

•  Support If you lower the horizon level, then you cut the lake. If you raise it, then you sacrifice the sky and add more grass on the bottom. I don't mind the horizon being at the center, the "big picture" is that this composition is great. --Murdockcrc (talk) 10:02, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Wonderful landscape, but bottom cropped too tight IMO. --Avenue (talk) 07:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--MASHAUNIX 17:25, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I don't like the images. The shade of the right hinders (disturb). Mountains need contrast. The sky is “dead” (without life to me).--Miguel Bugallo 01:18, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info After reading the comments above I thought a cropped version could be better. --mgeo talk 15:56, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--MASHAUNIX 17:25, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Tornadowhiz

• Per talk page consensus. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:34, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

•  Prefer this. --IdLoveOne (talk) 21:50, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I don't like the images. The shade of the right hinders (disturb). Mountains need contrast. The sky is “dead” (without life to me).--Miguel Bugallo 01:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Also, I don't like the crop. Too tight crop at bottom to me--Miguel Bugallo 01:19, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Martin Kozák (talk) 16:07, 24 December 2010 (UTC) – Rather nice (hm, above average), but unfortunately problematic composition.

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:33, 26 December 2010 (UTC)