Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Krokussen (Crocus), Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei.jpg

File:Krokussen (Crocus), Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2016 at 19:13:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Krokussen (Crocus), Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Krokussen (Crocus), Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants Crocus #Family Iridaceae.
•  Info Cheerful spring flowering in the sun. Krokussen (Crocus), Location, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 19:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 19:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely colors. INeverCry 20:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Per INeverCry. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support good quality and really well composed! --Hubertl 21:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The dark background has been lifted too much in post, I reckon, leading to a very noisy image visible at screen size. At only 3.5MP this isn't among our finest photographs. Despite the pretty flowers nicely arranged, technical quality is required to be at professional level. -- Colin (talk) 21:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

@Colin: If only you'd said "I reckon" in your comment on my last FPC, there's no way I could've gotten so pissy... INeverCry 07:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Well, now I look at the EXIF, if removed the "I reckon". Vibrance +25, Exposure +0.20ev, Contrast +25, Shadows +100, Blacks +100, Clarity +31. These are all the reasons why the image is so noisy: it has been pushed considerably in post. -- Colin (talk) 14:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

 Question Famberhorst, could you possibly undo some of this? I like the photo, but if it could be improved, that would be great. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Answer: ll try what the noise suppressing.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

 Done Noise reduction. May also get some cut above and below. --Famberhorst (talk) 06:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

I reckon you done fixed it up now y'all. INeverCry 07:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose -- per Colin -- Scewing (talk) 22:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Owain Knight (talk) 22:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I understand that this is a small file, but to me, it's a much better picture than big ones that are mostly blurred, including some of the subject. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 16:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants