Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kerimäen kirkkoranta.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Kerimäen kirkkoranta.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2022 at 05:49:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Finland
Info created & uploaded by User:Sampoki - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Support I feel like this has a kind of deceptively simple sublimity to it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)- Support Beautiful! Reminds me of Bergen. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful when viewed in full size. --Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- I had striked out my support vote because I had to think about the irritating something at the right. But the longer I look at it the more to looks just like some reflection or flare to me – technically an error, indeed, but it does not deteriorate the overall impression of the photo. Therefore I have enabled my support vote again. --Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Question What is on the water at the very right, a cloning error or something? --A.Savin 09:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)- Question Why would the sky be lighter on the left? The tree would have been better off-centre. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:09, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Comment It’s not a problem that the sky is ligher at the left – I have seen such gradations in many photos, so this can be 100% natural, and the reflection in the water shows the same gradation. But the thing on the right, spotted by A.Savin, is a problem; I do not know what it is, but it is indeed irritating. ---— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristeas (talk • contribs) 16:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I don't know if we'll hear from User:Sampoki, whose last contribution to Commons was in 2020. I don't know what it is. If enough people find it irritating, I'll have to just withdraw. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:10, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 20:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support Was on my list to nominate. Whatever's going on at the right doesn't bother me, this is the kind of motif where the overall effect is more important than the details Cmao20 (talk) 14:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality image, but I do not see any reason for FP nomination, low quality subject of image. -- Karelj (talk) 17:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This is more of a reason than usual from you, but that doesn't make it easy to relate to. We've featured photos of grates (including at least one I nominated), yet you think this is such a bad subject that it should be rejected on that account. Whatever. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:42, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:51, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas' analytical conclusion. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment About the crop suggestion: I don't think I should be cropping someone else's photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:51, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support Bright color and symmetrical motif -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:52, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support I thought it was another one of Cart's at first. Daniel Case (talk) 22:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, a kindred sensibility. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:39, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:20, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 21:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Finland
