Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kazakh yurts at night in the Kyzylkum desert, Uzbekistan.jpg

File:Kazakh yurts at night in the Kyzylkum desert, Uzbekistan.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2023 at 08:58:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kazakh yurts at night in the Kyzylkum desert, Uzbekistan.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kazakh yurts at night in the Kyzylkum desert, Uzbekistan.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Uzbekistan
•  Info created and uploaded by Carsten Siegel - nominated by ABAL1412 -- ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 08:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Info Kazakh yurts in the Kyzylkum desert, Uzbekistan. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 08:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 08:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support but please rename after FPC — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Please fix the cat --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

  Thanks to SHB2000. He fixed it. I didn't know that I have to put it in "Other". The Template:Commons FP galleries has the "By country" at the "Places", so I just copy the page name there. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

  Hi ABAL1412, you are confusing Categories (cat) and Galleries. The Gallery page Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Uzbekistan is fine. The problem is with the Category "Zelt" on the file page. That Category is shown in red, meaning that it doesn't exist. Most users don't like so called "red-linked" Categories on a FPC. You should do one of these things: Remove it, create it (with proper links and all) or change it. My guess is that this German-speaking user was using the German word " Zelt" meaning "Tent" and the Category should be Category:Tents in Uzbekistan. Since that Category is already present, you can just remove the "Zelt" cat. Language mistakes like this are common on this multi-lingual site, and you need to check such things before you make a nomination. I could have just fixed this for you, but since you are fairly new to the FPC, I think it was best to give you an explanation. Best, ----Cart (talk) 13:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

  Oh. I didn't know that. Thanks for explaining. - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 14:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

I guessed that. ;-) Now, please fix it. --Cart (talk) 14:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Neutral until properly renamed. ★ 17:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Any file mover can just go ahead and move it afterwards. Doing so now means some extra work because of the FPC nom. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  17:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Yes, please support if you believe the photo should be featured. I certainly do! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Done @Rhododendrites and ArionStar: Have renamed the file (and the nomination). It’s indeed a bit difficult to do this during the nomination, but I hope I have got all links. --Aristeas (talk) 07:58, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

• Good job! I  Support now. ★ 16:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks you for your effort! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 03:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose Interesting light but too noisy.--Ermell (talk) 21:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ermell. In addition, the moon and the clouds are too unsharp to me, and it is very dark. Are the yurts really leaning on like that ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 23:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

  "[I]t is very dark" – I mean, isn't that partially the motif of the photo? --SHB2000 (talk) 10:51, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Support The clouds aren't the main subject so I find that issue negligible for FP (but not POTY). --SHB2000 (talk) 13:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but the unsharp sky cannot be overlooked. 20 upper 15:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

• The night sky has to be sharp when the yurts are the subject? Getting a sharp night sky requires a longer exposure. I respect your taste but don't agree with it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Great subject and atmosphere. Quality is good for a nightshot. Yes, it’s dark, but it’s not uncommon that nights are dark, after all ;–) – this is Uzbekistan, not the far North with its polar night. It’s impossible to get the yurts and the sky sharp at the same time with a single shot; we would have to combine at least 2 shots. Or we could use a very high ƒ number, but then everything would be somewhat sharp and nothing really sharp. --Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support The composition works for me in full screen view, even if I would have cropped the image a bit at the top. Therefore, after consideration, I tend to agree with the convincing opinions of the supporters. Thanks to Aristeas for the effortful renaming during the ongoing nomination process. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:44, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Underexposed Night shot, but not a reason to be so dark -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose the mood has been captured in this well composed shot, but several technical shortcomings (i.e. noise, focusi) are not up to FP standard --Virtual-Pano (talk) 20:56, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:08, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose see my comment above -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support: per Aristeas --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Uzbekistan