Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hacienda San Jorge - Los Cancajos 01.jpg

File:Hacienda San Jorge - Los Cancajos 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 21:05:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hacienda San Jorge - Los Cancajos 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hacienda San Jorge - Los Cancajos 01.jpg

16000

1965

400

364

17127

7278

Stitching error

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
•  Info This time not a panorama of a natural but of a mainly man-made landscape; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 21:05, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 21:05, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support 我觉得这张照片非常棒 --Boothsift Is Here 02:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Isiwal (talk) 09:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but this tourism place to see is just cruel for my eyes and awareness of life. Nothing what I must see. --Hockei (talk) 17:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

• @Hockei: That's a bit unfair. You're opposing this not because of the image but you have something against touristy places. --Boothsift Is Here 05:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Interesting point of view while my reasoning outweighs for example "no wow", "nothing special" and so on who are constantly stated and accepted here. --Hockei (talk) 15:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

• No that's not quite the same. Here u r implying that no matter how this is shot, you'll oppose. Which is unfair, yes. - Benh (talk) 18:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

• I could sing a song about unfairness here. But this is not unfair but a valid reason. --Hockei (talk) 18:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

• @Hockei: Valid? Then all the buildings are invalid then, correct? This vote shouldn't count, do you realize what you are saying? --Boothsift Is Here 02:53, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment As I already said: It is a manmade landscape --Llez (talk) 10:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

• @Llez: Look at the red panda nomination, Hockei has something against things that seem "artificial". Don't ask me why--Boothsift Is Here 03:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Question Boothsift, is it really necessary to incite him against me just because I have a different opinion than you? Must that really turn to personal? --Hockei (talk) 07:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

• @Hockei: No, I was just explaining how you feel. I understand what you're saying on the zoo nomination, how you think it is not as "natural" as wildlife photos in the wild. That makes sense here as this hotel is clearly manmade. --Boothsift Is Here 08:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

• Please calm down. I think it is the best to finish this discussion --Llez (talk) 08:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment regard to Hockei's remark about empty remarks such as "no wow" or "nothing special" without further explanation, I agree with him! You can't do anything about that. You don't learn from that either! The guidelines are clear about this. I quote: Useless reasons for resistance include: No reason "I don't like it" and other empty reviews! So you have to take the trouble to motivate your rejection. Don't you do that. Then I think the rejection is not valid. Regarding the photo above: I have nothing to do with such a swimming paradise. Can't judge the photo in a neutral way. In such a case I do not vote. Then I won't harm anyone.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Shadow left of center is distracting to me; there's also an apparent stitching error on the lamppost near the right side at center. Daniel Case (talk) 14:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  •  Done Stiching error removed --Llez (talk) 16:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Boothsift Is Here 07:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other