Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HUN-2015-Budapest-Hungarian Parliament (Budapest) 2015-02.jpg

File:HUN-2015-Budapest-Hungarian Parliament (Budapest) 2015-02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2015 at 11:24:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:HUN-2015-Budapest-Hungarian Parliament (Budapest) 2015-02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HUN-2015-Budapest-Hungarian Parliament (Budapest) 2015-02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info Hungarian Parliament building in Budapest. Created and uploaded by Andrew Shiva - nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 11:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- ArildV (talk) 11:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition and lighting. I'm a bit surprised with the lack of details in the dark areas, it's more "smeary" than anything else. And the highlights are also a bit clipped. Not enough to spoil it! - Benh (talk) 17:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Great picture and an impressive camera gear. --Code (talk) 04:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support as Code --Hubertl 06:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support. Great! --Brateevsky {talk} 09:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support - thanks for the nom...--Godot13 (talk) 15:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Great lights, not a typical photo of the Hungarian Parliament. Einstein2 (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak support The clipped lights are not a deal-breaker given their overall size in the picture. Daniel Case (talk) 22:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 09:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose There are much better light options for parliament. Even in daylight. When I saw EXIF, I see this could be in much better quality. Medium format used at f/6.3 in panorama mode is a bit small even for APS-C sensor, regarding both, lens and sensor (diffraction disc). Looking for sweet spot of lens I saw they are amazing 4000 eur ...but I got it - f/8. So two stops too far. Then I checked how many pixles has this model, first I met the price again 4-5000 eur. Its 40 MPx. From my mind, I guess you are at least some 5 stops to far, perhaps 10 would be more close. That's why also the qualiy is not there as it should be. Automatic programe on 10.000 eur camera ? --Mile (talk) 10:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your comments Mile. If I wanted to take a typical night shot, then I wouldn't have waited until dawn to take it.--Godot13 (talk) 22:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Jebulon (talk) 17:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 15:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Same to Mile, the technical quality isn't that good it should be. And I think it's not the best time for a evening mood shoot. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture