Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Théâtre de l'Exposition. Palais des enfants.jpg

File:Grand Théâtre de l'Exposition. Palais des enfants.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2015 at 17:17:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Théâtre de l'Exposition. Palais des enfants.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Théâtre de l'Exposition. Palais des enfants.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
•  Info created by Jules Chéret / BnF, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very high resolution (300 Mpx) of a 19th-century poster by Jules Chéret. -- Yann (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support And as you might oppose?--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:10, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral (but thinking about opposing) It is big but so blurred that downscaling it won't remove any information at all. This should have the side effect of preventing some browsers from crashing when opening it. Also wonder where the grid pattern comes from. - Benh (talk) 19:33, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • I think the the grid pattern comes from the support texture. I wonder if it was paper, or textile? Please note that the original is quite big (244 x 88 cm). Regards, Yann (talk) 20:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Actually, I might agree about downscaling. Yann (talk) 20:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral. I know, I shouldn't complain about too much resolution. But my browser is really sweating trying to show me the image, and the 100% view shows it's really completely unnecessary. — Julian H.^✈ 20:42, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • @Benh and Julian Herzog: I downscaled it, is it suitable for you? ;o) The original is still available in the upload history. Yann (talk) 21:14, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Yes, thank you. Now I can reasonably judge it and see, for example, that it has about 3-4 Megapixels of actual resolution. I think 53 Megapixels should be enough to store that data. — Julian H.^✈ 21:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Sorry but I still have doubts about the result. It's still blurry, and not sure it renders as good as the original if printed at the same size (not that it's necessary). Don't think the banding is due to the support. It's colored, so I assume it's some sort of noise which came with the capture process. Maybe the original is soft like that ? - Benh (talk) 17:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment After looking at other posters from the same period, I made further adjustments: the white should be white. Yann (talk) 11:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 15:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive colors in 1889. --Laitche (talk) 11:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media