Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Canyon (Arizona, USA), South Rim nahe Tusayan -- 2012 -- 9.jpg

File:Grand Canyon (Arizona, USA), South Rim nahe Tusayan -- 2012 -- 9.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2013 at 06:38:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Canyon (Arizona, USA), South Rim nahe Tusayan -- 2012 -- 9.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand Canyon (Arizona, USA), South Rim nahe Tusayan -- 2012 -- 9.jpg

•  Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 06:38, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 06:38, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support A refreshing composition - I like how the canyon is framed by the trees in the foreground. Great lighting! --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:32, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support St1995 12:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Exactly as said by King Christian Ferrer 16:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Lazy composition; sky takes up most of the scene, trees don't so much frame as obstruct most of the view. The only positive this photo has is nice lighting.Fotoriety (talk) 22:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose The idea of using trees for framing was good and the light is also quite nice illuminating the vista beyond. The issues that I see are a) The photo does not look balanced, there is a bit more sky than probably required and mostly the sky is not that interesting b) The trees are positioned in such a way that they are obscuring the view, and as view is the main subject this is kind of distracting. I am sure you must have taken some efforts to capture this, but there are issues with the composition, unfortunately. Appologies. --Dey.sandip (talk) 05:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support — ♫♫ Leitoxx   The Police ♪♪ — 16:43, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, but per other opposes. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:35, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 08:27, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm not convinced by the composition either. It's slightly too much tree per canyon. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 12:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Leitoxx 13:27, 19 December 2013 (UTC)