Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:French Battleship Justice by the Detroit Publishing Co, 1909.jpg

File:French Battleship Justice by the Detroit Publishing Co, 1909.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2023 at 14:29:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:French Battleship Justice by the Detroit Publishing Co, 1909.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:French Battleship Justice by the Detroit Publishing Co, 1909.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Ships
•  Info created by Detroit Publishing Co. - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Info

Before: File:French Battleship Justice by the Detroit Publishing Co, 1909 - Sample of original image.jpg

After: File:French Battleship Justice by the Detroit Publishing Co, 1909 - Sample of restored image.jpg

Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Sorry Adam, but you can't display other big files like this on the nom, even if they are under a extend banner, the Bot will read these as 'alternatives' and your nomination will get messed up. Please remove these and only show them as file names: File:French Battleship Justice by the Detroit Publishing Co, 1909 - Sample of original image.jpg and File:French Battleship Justice by the Detroit Publishing Co, 1909 - Sample of restored image.jpg. Perhaps this would be better in the 'Historical' gallery? Thanks. --Cart (talk) 14:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Done. And I could see going either way for galleries. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment The linked files don't open Adam Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:17, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

  @Charlesjsharp: Odd, they work for me... um... try here to see them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:14, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

• @Charlesjsharp: The linked files do open, but they are not in the "standard" shape, like 16:9 or 3:2, just long cropped versions of the original, long strips, 430 px wide and 3277 pixels high. You are mistaking the unusual ratio of these cropped versions for files that "don't open". --Cart (talk) 05:51, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
• Oh! OK, thanks. I didn't see that they were cropped images. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:56, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:45, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:53, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support High level of detail for the period, and excellent restoration work -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Well done and interesting, but in my eye this is a clear VI and not a FP. Wow-effect and quality are below the FP-bar. --Milseburg (talk) 09:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 09:10, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:45, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
•  Support - ABAL1412 (talk) 21:24, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 19:44, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Ships