Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dornach - Goetheanum - Orgel2.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Dornach - Goetheanum - Orgel2.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2011 at 11:12:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Goetheanum: pipe organ with gallery

Please note: This picture came about a special agreement between the General Anthroposophical Society and me. I was allowed to take pictures of all objects and upload them under a free licence. Otherwise there is a restricted photo ban inside Goetheanum. -- Wladyslaw (talk) 11:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Noise is within the limits of the long exposure very good. This picture was made by ISO 100 and a tripod was used; any proposal what have been done better? Why is the light balance unfortunate? What is wrong with the composition. Please specify. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:28, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support nice composition; I really like that green light coming from below, but at the same time doesn't overtake the picture. One question: what are the two boxes in the middle of the pictures for? →AzaToth 20:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly I don't know exactly. On this picture you see actually three boxes [1]. But I have asked some experts and as soon I get an answer I will let you know. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:18, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
@99of9: You may have a point with your noise comment here. The structure is at some places very similar to camera noise, which is while quite distracting not a reason for opposition, so I struck that part. พ.s. 10:43, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but your argument is not comprehensible for me. Topic of this picture is the organ and nothing else. --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:00, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The organ itself is quite simple (I realize that's probably intentional, but that doesn't make it a striking image), I've seen many more impressive. The wall shapes add interest, and if it were shown in the context of a wide view of a grand room, it might get over the line for me. Also the music stand is distracting. --99of9 (talk) 10:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well I think it is a very exceptional organ and object for this picture. Maybe you did't find it so impressive. But I don't understand how the Hall should be included in this picture. The problem would be that the Hall would deflect from the main object. I made also a picture of the Great Hall File:Dornach - Goetheanum - Grosser Saal3.jpg, but this is a different topic. --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Out of interest (this is unlikely to change my vote), but what makes you think it is a very exceptional organ? --99of9 (talk) 05:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mister Hillewaert: instead of running against established rules like keeping the chronological order in discussions it would be very nice if you answer my questions about your questionable arguments. Your first argument (noise) was weak as well. Constructive collaboration is much more useful then your narrow-minded behavior and troll-like editwars (not the first time as we know) --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:05, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't see s.th. tilt. Please specify. Anthroposophic architecture does not align to regular and rectangular structural shape. Maybe you find this type of architecture disturbing but this should not be basis of valuation for this picture. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:58, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 22:22, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
SORRY NO, THE LAST VOTE IS ANONYMOUS, AND THEREFORE DOES NOT COUNT. Support = 7, Oppose = 3. --> FEATURED. --Jebulon (talk) 21:21, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Dornach_-_Goetheanum_-_Orgel2.jpg&oldid=60098946"