Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dilma Rousseff - foto oficial 2011-01-09.jpg

File:Dilma Rousseff - foto oficial 2011-01-09.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2011 at 02:38:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dilma Rousseff - foto oficial 2011-01-09.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dilma Rousseff - foto oficial 2011-01-09.jpg

•  Info uploaded by Dantadd - nominated by Kleiner
•  Support -- Kleiner (talk) 02:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Marmoulak (talk) 03:35, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Murdockcrc (talk) 09:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Skin looks a bit oversharpened for my taste. On the other hand it is not a beauty contest, so can't decide. bamse (talk) 10:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Yes for me - it's good and usefull. --Danny (talk) 13:10, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Professional photo, done for marketing purposes. Good quality, but no wow. I'm not keen to see this kind of images of politicians as featured. --Lošmi (talk) 13:26, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment I didn't get it: Professional photo, done for marketing purposes. Why exactly should this be a bad thing? If originally it's been used for something not good, that's quite irrelevant for this nomination. Kleiner (talk) 20:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
    •  Comment You took it out of context. It was only one part of my comment. --Lošmi (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Lošmi; good picture of a (relatively) ordinary subject. Jon C (talk) 20:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose columns coming out of the head is a no-go for a professional photo. --AngMoKio (座谈) 23:41, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment These are not mere columns: It's the easily recognized columns of Palácio da Alvorada, the official residence of Dilma Rousseff, and a symbol of Brasília's modern architecture, designed by Oscar Niemeyer. I consider the columns a very well-received detail in this photo, but it's just my POV. Nothing against who disagrees... Kleiner (talk) 00:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per AngMoKio.--Snaevar (talk) 12:40, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose--shizhao (talk) 12:57, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support - quite good actually. I think people should put politics aside when voting because we are choosing the best photo, not the best subject.--Avala (talk) 19:10, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Extremely notable photograph, as it is the official portrait of a major head of state. No technical problems spoil it. Missionary (talk) 15:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I bet it could pass if not for those annoying columns behind her head. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 04:21, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support: One of the best portrait photographs I've seen! TFCforever (talk) 05:23, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others--Miguel Bugallo 19:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose For creating an official portrait of the President with such a horrible background, the photographer should be sentenced to death for high treason. :) Wolf (talk) 16:18, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment ... Same problem for her predecessor !! --Jebulon (talk) 18:12, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Background. Yann (talk) 20:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)