Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Diceros bicornis MNHN.jpg

File:Diceros bicornis MNHN.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Mar 2011 at 00:35:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Diceros bicornis MNHN.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Diceros bicornis MNHN.jpg

•  Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 00:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support .  Info This skull (and the whole skeleton) of a Diceros bicornis (Black rhinoceros) was collected for the french National Museum for Natural History by the french naturalist Pierre Antoine Delalande during his travel in southern Africa, between 1818 & 1820-- Jebulon (talk) 00:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I need one of those as a pet! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 03:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Seems to smile ;-) --Schnobby (talk) 08:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Nice shot, nice object. Letartean (talk) 13:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I like the black hat.--Claus (talk) 17:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support he is smiling!!!--Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I bet the smile is an illusion, just as dolphins seem to smile all the time, witch is just one of nature´s illusions. However, it doesn't seem to matter, because the quality is good.--Snaevar (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Maybe I'll support when the CA is removed. W.S. 08:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• Your positive votes are like your photographs: always invisible.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Your comments are as acid as personal. W.S. 13:38, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
    • I am surprised they let vote, a stranger who did not produce any photograph. I draw the attention of the community about your behavior strange. It will be very easy for a critic to your level to amaze and delight us with your production. If I'm writing here is that on your talk page you erase the criticism you are doing. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
      • Is this really worth arguing over? Let's talk about the image, not those voting on it. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:37, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment You're right, one should talk about pictures, but nevertheless: FPC rules have changed. According to the new guidelines, only editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. I can't see a single edit (picture), only opposing votes. I'd like to know, why someone can vote without fulfillig the criteria for voters. If I not have the right to vote by not having 50 edits, I think I have also not the right to oppose. --Llez (talk) 20:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
    • Are we still using that rule? The vote was 11-9 to get rid of it. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 23:49, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
    • Yes, we are still using that rule, and actually it was 10-9 to get rid of it. The conseus was a heated discussion of what should have been a fairly simple conclusion and ended with one of the Commons administrators deciding the result.--Snaevar (talk) 15:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
    •  Comment advice.. User:Wetenschatje is one person.. if (s)he want to oppose to all the images he has only one vote.. Try to support the images that you like and ignore him/her. Ggia (talk) 00:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support well done photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Cephas (talk) 11:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 19:28, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:37, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Marmoulak (talk) 04:55, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Now inserted in some WP articles. --Myrabella (talk) 10:49, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect shot. Only "problem fossil?" is missing on the bottom of this shot, but that's nothing that can convince me not to vote for support :-) --Aktron (talk) 16:04, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I thought a lot before supporting, because I have to be consistent with what I said before ;) and the subject of this picture is definitely worth FP in my opinion. Execution (choice of point of view, masking) gives it justice. - Benh (talk) 22:17, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  •  Info I've removed a spot in the mask (beetween the two horns). --Jebulon (talk) 11:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects