Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 034.jpg

File:Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 034.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2017 at 07:26:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 034.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 034.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
•  Info Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands. Around the heath. Created and uploaded by Agnes Monkelbaan, nominated by me, --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I like the lighting very much. And, well, also the funny looking cow. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Might be for desert in Africa, but red channel is far away "from" Holland. --Mile (talk) 08:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support All what counts is the picture. And that one WOWs me! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I'm sorry, I've been looking for a featurable photo by you, and while this is definitely a technically high-quality photo and its composition is good, I'm not wowed by it. The bull is interesting but has a lot of grass partly blocking it and we don't see its eyes; the scenery is pleasant but not exceptional. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I really like this. The cow seems to "grow" from the ground up along with the grass. This is not a zoological photo of this breed of cattle but a photo of a scene and I know from experience that such pics are usually sneered at here at FPC. Glad someone had the guts to nominate one, thanks Martin! Colors are excellent and the quality is good. This photo looks like a painting and it brings to mind this rather prominent work of art. --cart-Talk 12:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Hipster cow! --Yann (talk) 14:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for the recommendation of my picture Martin.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Per Martin and cart; also for the same reason Mile opposes. Daniel Case (talk) 17:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support WOw ...lovely composition. The sky in this way is also better (...and 7) --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Very good. However, it is so close to 16:9 that I suggest you crop to that format. -- Colin (talk) 20:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Wow there is. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Nice European savannah :) Kruusamägi (talk) 23:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. The background is a bit too pastel-like for my tastes (too much NR), but otherwise very good. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 01:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support. The focus seems more on the foreground grass than on the animal; but other elements compensate it. Jee 02:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I have to say though that I am unsure about the authenticity of these tones as Mile mentioned above. This comment applies also to other images by Agnes. I enjoy very much the scenery overall but many of them just look to warm to me. Poco² 10:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support as per others, the white balance is a bit too warm, but big wow! Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 15:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:34, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support. --Gnosis (talk) 01:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 07:22, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 17:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Netherlands