Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Craticulina sp.jpg

File:Craticulina sp.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2009 at 11:49:14

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad 11:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Muhammad 11:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 14:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Kanonkas_(talk) 18:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support /Daniel78 (talk) 18:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Kosiarz-PL 20:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Rather on the limit for size, but good quality. Lycaon (talk) 23:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do not think this fly is interesting enough to be featured. Crapload (talk) 01:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support OK --Richard Bartz (talk) 02:01, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Cute. I like this one. JalalV (talk) 02:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Peripitus (talk) 02:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Another disgusting insect! --Karel (talk) 21:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  • You have the right to an opinion but this is one of the stupidest votes I have seen here at commons. You have opposed all my insect pictures with the same comment disgusting insect. For your information, insects play a great role in our ecosystem and however disgusting you may find them, the fact is they exist. Muhammad 08:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  •  Info Congratulation to your biological knowledge! But from my point of view is extremely stupid to add on this page pictures of the same disgusting subject again and again and again. Your image was choosen and I believe, it is enough. But next ten, twenty flies... they are good and valuable, but there is not reason to try made from them FP. Find some another creature, make good photo and my vote will be + for you (like it was in case cock photo ). --Karel (talk) 18:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
    • This fly and the featured one are completely different species of fly. Muhammad 04:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
    • ? --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:57, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Come on Karel, this is not a serious reason for oppose, you got no point here... --Acarpentier 04:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Meganmccarty (talk) 21:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Karel does have a point though; perhaps you need to find some new subjects to photograph? Same with ComputerHotline and Tomascastelazo. Great photographers, just need a seachange. 203.35.82.136 19:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Question No, doesn't work for me. I think Commons should continue having all different species and subspecies it cant get from contributor. Can you find another Craticulina featured picture on here? ;) --Acarpentier 21:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Support —kallerna™ 14:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Claus (talk) 05:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

result: 15 support (+1 late), 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Ö 10:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Good image of a creature with an undeserved bad press Rotational (talk) 05:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)