Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chicago from North Avenue Beach June 2015 panorama 2.jpg

File:Chicago from North Avenue Beach June 2015 panorama 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2015 at 03:48:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Chicago from North Avenue Beach June 2015 panorama 2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chicago from North Avenue Beach June 2015 panorama 2.jpg

15345

945

293

293

18000

4500

is that a photographer taking another panorama?? :P

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈ 07:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good time for this scene and nice angle. --Laitche (talk) 13:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support per Laitche. --Tremonist (talk) 13:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Posterized and blown reflections of lights on the water. Daniel Case (talk) 17:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment The light situation is not really convincing. The sky looks very greyish. A real blue hour shot could be much better, I think. Maybe the light comes from the wrong direction, too. I know it's not fair to complain about sharpness at this resolution but the whole picture looks very soft. All in all a nice panorama, but not one of our finest IMO. --Code (talk) 19:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 17:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose good but not good enough for FP. --Pine^✉ 20:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very big,I can accept LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Kadellar (talk) 14:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's the third time, I opened this image to realize, why I can't support it spontaneously. On the first sight its, impressive, of course! It's not because of the IMO not avoidable ghosts, it's because the dark parts lacks almost completely of structure. Sorry. --Hubertl 10:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes