Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 04.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 04.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2019 at 11:43:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:43, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 11:43, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Yes, funny idea, but image quality on the landscape is mediocre, and the flashlit masonry taking up 75 percent of the frame doesn’t look really nice. --Kreuzschnabel 12:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)- Support I think the idea is very good and the implementation successful --Milseburg (talk) 14:38, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Executed pretty well, I think. The resolution is sufficient that the frame-in-a-frame doesn't suffer too much. — Rhododendrites talk | 18:16, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Not perfect quality but overall a good idea well done. Cmao20 (talk) 18:59, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Nice idea, and to me the quality of the landscape is certainly good enough. --Domob (talk) 05:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, it's a nice idea but I don't get wowed neither by the landscape or by the wall. The wall seems to be a bit overcooked (direct flash I guess?) and the landscape doesn't have a straight point too look at. I wish there was a more distinctive feature like here. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel and Podzemnik. — Draceane talkcontrib. 21:19, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Podzemnik Poco a poco (talk) 21:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Question a tighter crop? see note. Charles (talk) 23:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info Crop as suggested by Charles --Llez (talk) 05:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support - This composition really works for me. Sharpness is not optimal, etc., but it's good enough for me to support a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Comment Much better, but the harsh flashlight on the inside wall at almost the same brightness as the sunlit parts still doesn’t appeal to me. Just looks unreal, can’t be "true", there’s two competing light sources here that won’t mix. Flashlight reduced to ⅛ or even less (plus softener) might have worked. --Kreuzschnabel 07:11, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Neutral I think I could support this if something were done to dim the flash on the wall. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Done Flash dimmed as proposed --Llez (talk) 19:11, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support either — Rhododendrites talk | 19:19, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support much better Charles (talk) 16:37, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:56, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support I also support this one. --Domob (talk) 09:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support So close to the opening I get scared of falling out. But I also support this version. --Milseburg (talk) 11:09, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support --XRay talk 15:37, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:05, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support No issues here. Cmao20 (talk) 20:38, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Aude
The chosen alternative is: File:Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Quéribus - 04a.jpg
