Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Caroline Hill as Mirza in W. S. Gilbert's The Palace of Truth.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2022 at 23:44:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by London Stereoscopic and Photographic Company - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)- Support not very sharp, but from 1870 must be the best as possbile --Ezarateesteban 17:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Comment I've fed this photo into my new magic toolbox and after a few minutes of work this came out: File:Caroline_Hill_as_Mirza_in_W._S._Gilbert's_The_Palace_of_Truth_enhanced.jpg I'm a bit scared now. --Granada (talk) 14:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Interesting exercise, but not relevant to the restored image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Certainly makes the mouth look odd if you zoom in. Good thumbnail, though. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:54, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Interesting exercise, but not relevant to the restored image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support Would it be too much of a sin to crop some of that empty upper space out? Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Not good to crop archive photos. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:46, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- I prefer CSS image crop for that. Would also screw with one of the en-wiki usages (Part of a set of two images displayed next to each other) Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support From 1870 and looks good at larger than original size. It strikes me as odd that she wasn't smiling, but how long did exposures have to be in 1870? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Do remember this is a photo of her in character, which might be as much of the issue. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:43, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Point taken. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support I like how she looks somewhat unusual because she personifies that character … Ironically, this way she appears much more “real” and natural to me than many ”correct” portraits of that time ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 17:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 11:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women
