Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Callisto diagram.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Callisto diagram.svg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2014 at 17:18:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Jupiter's moon Callisto, all by Kelvinsong—Love, Kelvinsong talk 17:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 17:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)- Support --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 17:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 17:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 19:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Love the bokeh effect of Jupiter in the background. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Finally someone actually noticed!!¡¡ 😊 It's because all my earth science diagrams are actually meant to be miniatures hence the short focal lengths, wide apertures, & iOS7-style scattering effects. Idk if I got the falloffs right though—I'm not sure how circles blur with bokeh so I just used a gaussian filter. I've never had to do point bokeh so it's not that obviouss—Love, Kelvinsong talk 23:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- I've actually noticed it all the while, including in the other diagrams. And I like it, as it lets us know which planet the moon belongs to, and gives the effect of viewing the moon from space. Btw Kelvinsong, is it possible for you to create similar diagrams for the planets and dwarf planet (Pluto)? (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 02:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Ofc!! I'll probably do Jupiter first then Saturn & the terrestrial planets. && Thanks everyone for all the support!!!¡ ☺—Love, Kelvinsong talk 21:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I've actually noticed it all the while, including in the other diagrams. And I like it, as it lets us know which planet the moon belongs to, and gives the effect of viewing the moon from space. Btw Kelvinsong, is it possible for you to create similar diagrams for the planets and dwarf planet (Pluto)? (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 02:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Finally someone actually noticed!!¡¡ 😊 It's because all my earth science diagrams are actually meant to be miniatures hence the short focal lengths, wide apertures, & iOS7-style scattering effects. Idk if I got the falloffs right though—I'm not sure how circles blur with bokeh so I just used a gaussian filter. I've never had to do point bokeh so it's not that obviouss—Love, Kelvinsong talk 23:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support —Blurred Lines 13:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Halavar (talk) 19:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:48, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Baresi franco (talk) 20:52, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support I would put the text about Callisto on the lower part of the image so that it wouldn't cover Jupiter. ;) Kruusamägi (talk) 13:54, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment It would be nice if what you have left in this series was offered as a set instead of going through each nomination individually. However, I would suggest to ensure a smooth nomination process that a standard be applied to them all. Also agree with Kruusamägi regarding the placement. No need to obscure that nice bokeh work :-) Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:32, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oh stahp it's literally just a 8.0 gaussian blur on jupiterr!. Moved the title (though personally I think it's better to have the title superimposed on it to make it clear that Jupiter is in the background). && I wish I had the patience to do all of them & nominate them as a set but the promotion of each one motivates me to do the next one ;). Also I didn't really want to invest so much effort if there was a chance they wouldn't be very well recieved bc a lot of large projects I drew before wound up getting ignored in FPC so I don't do those anymore.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 20:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- No worries. Bask in the sunshine of your efforts :-) Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:06, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thankss! && I don't think you actually voted yet.. :)—Love, Kelvinsong talk 20:19, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- No worries. Bask in the sunshine of your efforts :-) Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:06, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oh stahp it's literally just a 8.0 gaussian blur on jupiterr!. Moved the title (though personally I think it's better to have the title superimposed on it to make it clear that Jupiter is in the background). && I wish I had the patience to do all of them & nominate them as a set but the promotion of each one motivates me to do the next one ;). Also I didn't really want to invest so much effort if there was a chance they wouldn't be very well recieved bc a lot of large projects I drew before wound up getting ignored in FPC so I don't do those anymore.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 20:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Question How could we be sure that this design shows the truth ? Is Callisto's interior really like that ? In other words: are these diagrams "scientific" ? Thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 23:28, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- The diagram is based on a doctoral thesis and the WP article according to the description. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:38, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- Jebulon Good question & not really one I can answer. Usually I just draw what the sources specify & if the scientists are wrong you can't really blame me. I use 3D projection software & draw these things with neurotic precision because I'm like OCD with this so you certainetely don't have anything to worry about on my end. Really I don't think it's even possible to be wrong with subjects like this cause from what I read not even the lab coats know what's inside the Jupiter moons. It mostly consists of all the scientists making their own guesses about the moon structure and each guess is different. Sometimes the scientists even contradict themselves (along the lines of "wtf eight pages ago you said Callisto had Ice III inside it & now it turned into Ice V??"). If I tried to average the numbers or cover every possibility there would probably not actually be any Callisto diagram to vote on here. Really the only way to do this is to just pick one source that's fairly recent & comprehensive enough & go with it. Ig if a PhD publication can't be trusted then I don't even know what can then.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 20:15, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Kelvinsong for complete answer. I'm fully ignorant about astronomy. I don't want to "blame" anybody, and especially not scientists ! It was just a series of questions, and I think they are not illegitime in this case. Your kind answer is sufficient for me. "Love" too, --Jebulon (talk) 22:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Jebulon Good question & not really one I can answer. Usually I just draw what the sources specify & if the scientists are wrong you can't really blame me. I use 3D projection software & draw these things with neurotic precision because I'm like OCD with this so you certainetely don't have anything to worry about on my end. Really I don't think it's even possible to be wrong with subjects like this cause from what I read not even the lab coats know what's inside the Jupiter moons. It mostly consists of all the scientists making their own guesses about the moon structure and each guess is different. Sometimes the scientists even contradict themselves (along the lines of "wtf eight pages ago you said Callisto had Ice III inside it & now it turned into Ice V??"). If I tried to average the numbers or cover every possibility there would probably not actually be any Callisto diagram to vote on here. Really the only way to do this is to just pick one source that's fairly recent & comprehensive enough & go with it. Ig if a PhD publication can't be trusted then I don't even know what can then.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 20:15, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- :-) Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:12, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /—Blurred Lines 12:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
