Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Breil-Brigels, Lag da Breil- Flem. 23-09-2022. (actm.) 11.jpg

File:Breil-Brigels, Lag da Breil- Flem. 23-09-2022. (actm.) 11.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2023 at 05:05:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Breil-Brigels, Lag da Breil- Flem. 23-09-2022. (actm.) 11.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Breil-Brigels, Lag da Breil- Flem. 23-09-2022. (actm.) 11.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)
•  Info Breil-Brigels Outflow of river Flem in Lag da Breil
  All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:05, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:05, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Technical quality - look at the rocks - not great. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

• Thank you for your comment. alternate version added.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:46, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Like this one more than the other. -- -donald- (talk) 06:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support +1 -- Radomianin (talk) 06:29, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 17:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 19:29, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:34, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very good but not quite an FP to me because of the graininess I think Charles was reacting to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support Good for me, but it would be even better when the noise in the shadows could be reduced. --Aristeas (talk) 14:10, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Done. Noise reduction in the shadow parts. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Hi Agnes, I took the liberty of de-noising the photo a bit, especially in the shadowy parts of the image, as well as gently increasing the sharpness. But in the meantime you have already made a new version. This one is already a bit better, but still quite noisy in the dark sections. So feel free to take a closer look at my edit and use it if you like. You can find the photo under this link. I think an edit summary like Denoised with the help of User:Radomianin is okay and appropriate according to the Commons guidelines. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment Thank you very much, Agnes and Radomianin, for your efforts! Both new versions look better. If I had the choice, I think Radomianin’s version is even better, so I would follow his offer ;–). But it’s your photo, Agnes, and it’s your choice which version you prefer. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
      •  New version Dear reviewers @Agnes Monkelbaan, -donald-, XRay, ArionStar, Kiril Simeonovski, Ikan Kekek, and Aristeas: At the request of the author on my talk page, I have updated the file. Changes: Denoised the dark areas as much as possible and applied a gentle sharpening. However, some basic graininess remained. More denoising would have made the image much too smooth and would have destroyed the details. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:50, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

• Radomianin, Thank you very much for this.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

• full  Support now; thank you both again! --Aristeas (talk) 06:59, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --imehling (talk) 16:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice but not outstanding IMHO. Waterfalls are cool but the top crop and water flow itself is not special to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special for FP. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:50, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

* Oppose OK for QI but nothing really special for FP. -- Karelj (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment The voting period ended already at 05:05 a.m. (UTC), therefore the last added vote at 11:21 a.m. (UTC) is invalid. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Alternative f/11

•  Support --Llez (talk) 16:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Grainier than the other version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:50, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

* Oppose OK for QI but nothing really special for FP. -- Karelj (talk) 11:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment The voting period ended already at 05:05 a.m. (UTC), therefore the last added vote at 11:19 a.m. (UTC) is invalid. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)

The chosen alternative is: File:Breil-Brigels, Lag da Breil- Flem. 23-09-2022. (actm.) 11.jpg