Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boletus erythropus 2010 G3.jpg

File:Boletus erythropus 2010 G3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2010 at 09:40:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Boletus erythropus 2010 G3.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boletus erythropus 2010 G3.jpg

33

42

2425

558

2500

2800

If you use a mask, making this part more bright.. probably this can enhance more the image. Ggia (talk) 15:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

33

1192

617

1575

2500

2800

Also here. If you use a mask, making this part more bright.. can enhance the image. Ggia (talk) 15:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:40, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Info Dotted Stem Bolete Boletus erythropus. Ukraine.
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:40, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support not bad --Mile (talk) 14:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Very good composition, but I don't like the flash light much and outside the mushroom is pretty noisy. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:23, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I understand THFSW, but I think it (the flash light) gives a very good effect. I like this. No unacceptable noise to me.--Jebulon (talk) 22:17, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support, I also like that light. I tried to reduce noise at borders in File:Boletus_erythropus_2010_G3_edited.jpg. Feel free to do whatever you want to do with. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:39, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 09:41, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I would prefer if in the image a mask will be applied in the upper part (above mushroom).. in order to increase the brightness. But the image nerveless is good. Ggia (talk) 07:58, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 13:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support ... after pondering. --Cayambe (talk) 18:44, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose noise is not a very big problem imo, but the flash. The upper part of the mushroom is too dark and looks like lampshade which lighted the lower half. The background looks somehow photographed somewhere else and then copied in it (I think because of the flash). The foliage at the bottom left should be also removed before taking an image. It can't be a big problem to take a photo of the the mushroom with a tripod without falsh light. Quality is okay, but I think it could be better too. So this picture isn't featured in my opinion! --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 11:51, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support. JukoFF (talk) 19:08, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Carschten. Lycaon (talk) 23:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 16:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Carschten--Miguel Bugallo 21:54, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants