Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloemknop van een goudsbloem (Calendula officinalis) 03-07-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg

File:Bloemknop van een goudsbloem (Calendula officinalis) 03-07-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2020 at 15:20:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bloemknop van een goudsbloem (Calendula officinalis) 03-07-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloemknop van een goudsbloem (Calendula officinalis) 03-07-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
•  Info Flower bud in development of a Calendula officinalis Focus stack of 13 images. The diameter of the flower bud in this photo is ± 16 mm.
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice quality and something different! --Poco a poco (talk) 15:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice indeed! Aha! Je hebt nu een foto staplen-programma. Super goed! This brings to mind one of the most famous Swedish poems (English translation and German) by Karin Boye. --Cart (talk) 15:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --StellarHalo (talk) 16:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice, and interesting plant. Yet if you look at the background, even in preview you can see kind of posterization all over the picture. And if you look closely, something went wrong at the top + at the bottom edge. Can you do something about it? --A.Savin 18:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment You need to reprocess this asap Famberhorst. Something has gone seriously wrong. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Abstain for now - the odd banding at the top and bottom definitely needs to be fixed. Once issues are corrected this is definitely FP. Cmao20 (talk) 22:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Cmao20 (talk) 18:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I love this photo and hadn't noticed the banding when I saw it on QIC. I'll wait for the fixes to be made. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Done. correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:44, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

• OK, and what about the posterization, and all the strange spots in the bottom-right corner? Any chance to get a better background? New development maybe? --A.Savin 07:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Not done still posterization everywhere Famberhorst. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:47, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I think they are dew drops. That part of the green leaf was closest to the camera lens. Making it slightly more visible.--Famberhorst (talk) 10:03, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Supportnot ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:50, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 05:01, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:01, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support looks like penne pasta. Tomer T (talk) 08:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

To me it looks like some horrid maw of a fearsome sci-fi movie creature, à la the Sarlacc Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Buidhe (talk) 08:28, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The flower bud is great; assume that the spots in the background are really dew drops etc. --Aristeas (talk) 11:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 13:56, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 22:22, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 20:51, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae