Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloem van een narcis tete a tete (Narcissus). 01-03-2023 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg

File:Bloem van een narcis tete a tete (Narcissus). 01-03-2023 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2023 at 15:49:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bloem van een narcis tete a tete (Narcissus). 01-03-2023 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloem van een narcis tete a tete (Narcissus). 01-03-2023 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family Amaryllidaceae.
•  Info Hoarfrost on a flower of a daffodil tete a tete (Narcissus). Focus stack of 16 photos.
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think we can expect a more interesting composition, with cleaner background, for such a common flower. The hoarfrost is minimal. The stacking has a major error. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:13, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just a high resolution picture in my view. Cluttered background, blurry greenery and I find the angle of view unattractive -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:53, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Question Thank you for your response. My question: what do you mean by high resolution photo?--Famberhorst (talk) 16:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

• 4,608 × 3,456 pixels -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

• Note: I thought you meant this is a single photo. But this is a stacked photo of 16 exposures of the flower bud and flower stalk of a small daffodil variety. These stood in groups under the trees along a path. If you want to photograph a flower separately, you always get the leaves of the other daffodils in the background. I deliberately blurred this one as much as possible by only stacking the flower bud so that you involve the natural background in the photo. You don't have to like that, but this way of photographing is common in magazines about flowers and plants.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

• Found in magazines much more appealing specimens. The stem of this one seems rather slack -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

• These are photos of cultivated potted plants. We call this 'comparing apples and oranges'.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

• Dear Sir, you are comparing your picture to magazines, not me. These are your tags. Now feel free to improve your description in case it lacks accuracy -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose Dull light and busy background, per others. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:57, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Alternative, another version

•  Oppose The background is still cluttered, and the angle unattractive in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)