Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloem van een Rudbeckia fulgida. 02-09-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg

File:Bloem van een Rudbeckia fulgida. 02-09-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2020 at 05:25:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bloem van een Rudbeckia fulgida. 02-09-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloem van een Rudbeckia fulgida. 02-09-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
•  Info Flower of one Rudbeckia fulgida. An indestructible plant for a sunny spot in the garden. Focus stack of 14 photos.
  by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Great flower picture, but I don't like the unrealistic choice of backgrounds. With that much light on the flower, I can't imagine it being astronomical twilight or whatever this is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't like the non-nature background Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Background is OK for me. Cmao20 (talk) 11:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very good light. The background works for me, perhaps because of its complementary color, and thus according to the color theory, the combination is simply harmonious like that - same choice for an ambigram I made recently :-) And also because this deep blue enhances the indigo center of the flower. Of course, it is artificial like could be wallpaper or a painted wall - definitely not a blue hour with this light - but still a simple and compelling setting in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:48, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Maybe it would be even better if the background was a bit lighter (is that the right English word?), but Basile put it very well. --Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes, lighter or brighter both work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Neutral I encourage using natural background instead, because it's hard to imagine a garden reserve with this kind of background. --Ivar (talk) 14:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I'd support if the blurry area/FS halo (see note) is fixed Poco a poco (talk) 18:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

  Ok, looks better, you got my  Support, Poco a poco (talk) 10:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Yes, this one works for me! --El Grafo (talk) 08:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Basile. Black would have been a solid but all-too-common choice for this background; dark blue is an interesting changeup. Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae