Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Avatr 12 IAA 2023 1X7A0578.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Avatr 12 IAA 2023 1X7A0578.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2023 at 10:23:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
- Info created by Alexander-93 - uploaded by Alexander-93 - nominated by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 10:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support Super clean composition and striking lighting. -- MB-one (talk) 10:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support Per nominator. ★ 12:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 15:39, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but that's just a car. I don't see the value for a featured picture. However, in all technical aspects the picture is good. --Ephramac (talk) 20:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Ephramac It's not the car, that makes this image special, but the composition and execution which are outstanding and create tremendous value IMO. We have many FP of generic or mundane objects. That's not really the point. MB-one (talk) 12:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- I think, it is not very special either. It is a car photographed like cars have been photographed a million times. Often when it comes to "mundane objects" they can be photographed in an interesting way, for example playing with the lighting and composition, or for moving objects with the timing or exposure. Here, the picture is not special, albeit the exposure and focus being flawless. --Ephramac (talk) 18:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Ephramac It's not the car, that makes this image special, but the composition and execution which are outstanding and create tremendous value IMO. We have many FP of generic or mundane objects. That's not really the point. MB-one (talk) 12:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment What's special to me is the gray-against-gray-against-gray of the floor, car and wall, and the lack of distracting elements to the background like lots of bisected people that we often see in photos from car expos, but I haven't decided whether that's enough to support a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe I can give you some more information about the car: The world premiere took place at IAA 2023, so it is one of the first models in the series to be shown to the public. Avatr is currently selling cars only in China, so it is unsure, if we get other images of the 12 in the near future. Moreover it might show the improvements of Chinese cars in the last few years.--Alexander-93 (talk) 21:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nah, it's more than "just a car". --SHB2000 (talk) 11:34, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- It is literally just a car. :-D --Ephramac (talk) 18:10, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I used to ride this baby in Need for Speed, but really, like the comment above, it's just a car. 20 upper 19:24, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment IMO a car ceases to be "just a car" when it is photographed in such an extraordinary artistic way. Applying good light and photography skills to an ordinary object will move the photo into another zone. Looking at just the object and not how it's captured, is a slightly naïve way of looking at photos. Often, simplicity in a photo is the very hardest thing to do. Having shot many shiny cars/motorcycles/shiny machines, I simply marvel at how clean this is. And oh yes, I've also had my fair share of "It's just a XXX". ;-) --Cart (talk) 22:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 08:36, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Not bad, but lacks perspective correction and it was taken too close + wide angle lens --> too much distortion Poco a poco (talk) 19:20, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Crop too tight at the bottom (shadow is cut off, lead room missing) and extreme distorsions due to the short distance between the camera and the subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ephramac and others. ~Moheen (keep talking) 14:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)