Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 139-141 HDR.jpg

File:Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 139-141 HDR.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2023 at 09:14:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 139-141 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 139-141 HDR.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
•  Info created & uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:14, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:14, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Fine quality but why the crop? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

• Well, why not? it was a photographer choice. I've different views of the Atomium with and without crop. I wouldn't haver probably nominated this version of the Atomium at first, but the perspective is also interesting. Poco a poco (talk) 14:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, but this crop doesn't work for me. I would like to see a crop like this or this. -- Ivar (talk) 16:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose Yep, and the second one you linked above would probably get my vote if nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

• +1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose I also think this crop doesn't work for this structure.--Peulle (talk) 11:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Awkward crop in my view. Agree with Ivar -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:05, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support I love the creative composition. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:28, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support I have absolutely no problem with the crop. The near-semicircles work just as well compositionally; in fact I bet leaving them whole would have made any ensuing crop look painfully tight.

  I really like the sci-fi film feel of this ... in fact, I realized why: this suggests a rear view of the typical Star Trek starship design. Daniel Case (talk) 17:56, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

•  Support As a confessing Roddenberry fan, I agree with Daniel's statement. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:04, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose The crop should be wider. NightWolf1223 (talk) 03:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per Daniel, and it makes me see the Atomium as I have never seen it before. --Aristeas (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --August Geyler (talk) 19:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)