Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anas acuta male.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Ljubljana - Anas acuta male.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2011 at 20:27:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by PetarM -- Mile (talk) 20:27, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 20:27, 23 February 2011 (UTC)- Support Quack, quack. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Oppose Blown/Overexposed, especially at the white parts of the duck such as it´s neck. The histogram tells the same story. Also, I am looking for something that extinguishes this photo from other duck pictures, and I couldn't really find it.--Snaevar (talk) 23:56, 23 February 2011 (UTC)- Oppose I agree with Sneavear, sorry. --Cephas (talk) 00:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sneavear too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:28, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Info OK, i made "fur transplantation" of burnt areas from exactly the same duck, of same set of pictures. --Mile (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a spectacular compo and not sharp to boot. W.S. 14:29, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Comment the fur transplantation did reduce the overexposure. The green and blue colors are good, but it didn't really impact the red color exposure as much.--Snaevar (talk) 11:52, 26 February 2011 (UTC)- Cute duck, but
Neutral -- IdLoveOne (talk) 18:23, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:34, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
