Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altocumulus cloud.jpg

File:Altocumulus cloud.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2010 at 18:23:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Altocumulus cloud.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altocumulus cloud.jpg

•  Info created by Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 18:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC) (please credit as Rubinstein Felix) - uploaded by Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 18:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC) - nominated by Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 18:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC) -- Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 18:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 18:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Grainy, the color balance is off and an antenna. /Daniel78 (talk) 21:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Even if this is of sufficient technical quality, there is no wow. --99of9 (talk) 22:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Daniel78 and 99of9 --Pjt56 (talk) 13:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:44, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Just clouds. No "wow." Tiptoety ^talk 06:54, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose A little bit grainy. --High Contrast (talk) 20:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Brackenheim (talk) 23:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 08:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)