Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:99 - Machu Picchu - Juin 2009.edit1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:99 - Machu Picchu - Juin 2009.edit1.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2009 at 08:42:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by me -- S23678 (talk) 08:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Comment I'm nominating 2 versions of the image, since I think the larger version (which I prefer by much) may get opposes from 2 reasons : quality problems on the left tried, but can't get rid and shade from the Wayna Picchu, on the right, hence the smaller second version. A third version, getting rid of only the left side, is also available, but I'll bring it up only if necessary. Both images were uploaded at full resolution and do suffer quality problems when viewed at 100% zoom, so they should be viewed with some downsampling. To do so, or if the image is crashing your browser, please view downsampled versions here. Some flare got removed on the left side by cloning as well. These are HDR images taken from the small ruins on top of Wayna Picchu, looking down on the Lost City of the Incas.
Support -- S23678 (talk) 08:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)- Comment Both versions could use a denoise IMO. -- JovanCormac 11:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- I've uploaded denoised versions, and they are shown on the downsampling page. I'll replace them in the nominations if people think they are better versions. Beware as well, on the downsampled version, of trees in the shade that may look like noise. --S23678 (talk) 15:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support NR version Much better. I was talking about the noise in the sky mostly. -- JovanCormac 07:58, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support I like that you provide "fake downsampled" versions. That's enough to be seen how the image will look if it's downsampled, so there's no need for actual downsampling. --Lošmi (talk) 21:12, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Excellent quality. --NormanB (talk) 02:03, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support —kallerna™ 15:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support I prefer this not cropped version --Phyrexian (talk) 16:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support I prefer this version. The visible sun makes it more dramatic/exciting --Simonizer (talk) 07:01, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support, --Vprisivko (talk) 20:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 09:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Crop[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2009 at 08:42:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Support -- S23678 (talk) 08:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Aqwis (talk) 12:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Mbz1 (talk) 14:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:07, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support --NormanB (talk) 02:03, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support --99of9 (talk) 02:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support I like this one. --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support —kallerna™ 15:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Great quality foto of Macchu Picchu. --Korman (talk) 23:14, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support, --Böhringer (talk) 11:19, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support, --Vprisivko (talk) 20:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 09:45, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:03, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places
The chosen alternative is: File:99_-_Machu_Picchu_-_Juin_2009.edit3.jpg
