Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:13-08-20-kiel.jpg

File:13-08-20-kiel.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2015 at 23:34:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:13-08-20-kiel.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:13-08-20-kiel.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info Tower of the Town Hall Kiel at night - all by Ralf Roleček
•  Support -- Ralf Roleček 23:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Das Bild hängt schief --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Die Spitze ist schief. Der Sockel ist gerade. --Ralf Roleček 08:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support D'SuperHero (talk) 07:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Info Users whose accounts have at least 50 edits can vote. --Ivar (talk) 08:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Light/dark contrast is appealing. --Tremonist (talk) 14:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good night shot. --XRay ^talk 15:10, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak support I can see why the fading dusk was included, but ideally a shot like this would just be the illuminated tower. Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment - Yeah. I don't love this photo because it's full of hazy dark areas, and necessarily so because it is difficult if not impossible to photograph such an illuminated tower and get it to look right, while also using an exposure sufficient to resolve the rest of the buildings. I don't feel I can support featuring this photo, but I abstain out of respect for general sentiment. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:27, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like it. I'd just prefer a little more light in the sky, that would make it less empty (and make the light on the tower a smidge less monochromatic and contrasty). — Julian H.^✈ 10:50, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too dark. It would have been great a bit earlier. Yann (talk) 13:44, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support A tower as a admonishing guard. Not allowing an argument. So it was conceived, right? --Hubertl 16:07, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose For the sky colour, I agree with Yann, but I suspect then we'd see some other ugly buildings. Apart from the tower, there isn't anything interesting in the frame. Sharpness isn't great. -- Colin (talk) 16:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:50, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places