Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Świętokrzyski Bridge (5950341919).jpg

File:Świętokrzyski Bridge (5950341919).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 May 2022 at 22:12:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Świętokrzyski Bridge (5950341919).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Świętokrzyski Bridge (5950341919).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Poland
•  Info created by Kuba Bożanowski - uploaded by Andrew J.Kurbiko - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 22:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Andrei (talk) 22:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose description may be improved, sorry Ezarateesteban 23:15, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Świętokrzyski Bridge in Warsaw is an adequate description to me. We see a couple of towers and a bunch of girders. And this is good as an abstract composition, but I haven't decided whether I consider it an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
• @Ezarate: I agree the description was poor. That was in part because of an error which hid the name of the bridge. I've expanded it now. Does this change your vote? Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose This is a great idea but for me it's one of these photos that would have to be roughly symmetrical in the lines and shapes, and the fact that it's a little off centre means it falls a little short to me Cmao20 (talk) 12:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support works for me. yes, would be better if it were symmetrical, but I appreciate the motif/effect. A question, though, near the top-left of the left tower one of the cables seems to just end in mid-air. What's going on there? What don't I understand about the construction? — Rhododendrites ^talk |  21:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Take a look at File:Most Świętokrzyski 2013 (3).JPG for example. The cables end in black "knobs" near the towers. I think one of these is responsible for the illusion. --Cart (talk) 01:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Support per Rhododendrites -- Radomianin (talk) 05:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:41, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Rhododendrites (“weak” per Cmao20’s points). --Aristeas (talk) 06:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451400 07:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Karelj (talk) 11:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Low wow factor. Not special enough in my view. Moreover, I agree that the very poor description "in Warsaw, Poland" is not acceptable for a FP candidate. -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per Cmao20. Yann (talk) 09:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support, because I'd be satisfied to see this on the wall in a museum show. It was undoubtedly nominated because it is special as an abstract composition, and I find that it is. And by the way, abstract works don't have to be symmetrical. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose also as per Cmao20 --Stepro (talk) 09:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Rhododendrites.--Ermell (talk) 14:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)