Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ópera, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 54-56 HDR.jpg

File:Ópera, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 54-56 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 12:57:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ópera, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 54-56 HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ópera, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 54-56 HDR.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
•  Info Ceiling over the Grand staircase in Garnier Opera or Palais Garnier, Paris, France. It was built for the Paris Opera from 1861 to 1875 at the behest of Emperor Napoleon III following the plans of architect Charles Garnier. It was the primary theatre of the Paris Opera and its associated Paris Opera Ballet until 1989, when a new opera house, the Opéra Bastille. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Thi (talk) 14:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support There are a couple of strange shadows and light trails at the bottom right that I wonder if you could work on. But they do not affect the interesting bit of this ceiling, and the subject, resolution and detail is easily sufficient for FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

• Good point, Cmao20, I oversaw that, it was a real issue that's why I now opted for a square crop, FYI too, @Thi, Charlesjsharp, and ArionStar: Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

• Better but you exported it at the wrong size Poco a poco Cmao20 (talk) 19:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

• Oops, fixed, thank you Poco a poco (talk) 19:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Still used for ballet performances. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 17:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Юрий Д.К 23:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose The edit in comparison with the original QI image is too far. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

• Fair enough, Sebring12Hrs, I removed the QI stamp and renominated the image in its current version again for QI. I've to say that the issues appointed by Cmao20 should have avoided the image to become QI. Poco a poco (talk) 16:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

I am ok with your fisrt edit of the 4th February, but not the others. I find there a lot of QI pictures with edit. I know its not forbbiden, but I don't like this. Sorry. Despite my vote, tour picture will be probably a QI ;) --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

To me the best solution would be to re-upload a new one. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Sebring12Hrs, there is now one own version of the file with the former crop. Poco a poco (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

• I'm liking that version better. It's prettier to me and breathes more. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

• The thing is that there are issues in that version that require major editing, I cannot just propose an alt version. I'd have to find time to fix it Poco a poco (talk) 06:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

• Thank you ! I think it's the best way. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support --XRay 💬 14:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful. --Aristeas (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings